*You look sexier with that haircut, my dear Boy*



Strange thing coming from me, Eh?

As much as I respect Serj for being an ok guy, his heart is in the right place, unfortunately his brain is not.

He sulks and bitches about the Armenian Genocide and yet so conveniantly does not understand or adheed the injustice and bullshit happening within Armenia!

Armenia is NOTORIOUS for female abuse and pedophilia (Over half of Armenian women admit to being beaten or abused in their lifetime). But then again, Serj does not seem to be so straight edge himself. I am sure he is like one of the people who could defend his shit to the bitter end, and justify everything wrong with the cause. I hate him for this, mainly because he is trying to bring justice to a country's pride and union, while ignoring the fact that the country itself is a disgusting mess of domestic abuse, prostitution, child abuse, rape and corrupt police officers who take quite the lovely joy in acting God.

Sure, he could counter that and say "All countries have bad people", but that brings me to how the people make the country and not visa versa.  Ever notice how, even if countries are really close together, they have TOTALLY different lifestyles, cultures and religions/beliefs?

Well, it is hellbent in Armenia's absolutely primitive and stoned thought that women are supposed to be this way and they should be beaten if they do not comply, and kids can consent to sex. There. Boogaboo.

It is the country that is oppressing and now it is screaming "Oppressed!!!"?

I was for the Iraqi war, not because I support or like America, but because Iraq has oppressed so many people for so long, that they can't scream oppressed now.

Now that Armenia has some big bad rock star up there representing it, it is starting to get a bit cocky.

Anyway, this is one of his many many many pathetic and undereducated thoughts on the world, here are some more:

In the song "Mesmerize", his/Daron Malakian's band sings:

"Why don't you ask the kids at Tiananmen Square, was fashion the reason why they were there..."

Well, to put it simply Mr.Tankian, Yes. Fashion was the reason they were there.

The "kids" at Tiananmen square were the protesting against the Chinese Government, through and through they were looking for a more.... hmm... AMERICAN rule. A more... Capitalist rule.

They wanted to make sure that they could be allowed to do whatever, whenever. And if that meant that they wanted Gucci pants and plastic dog shit for jokes, even though the government at the time found it soooo unnecessary (and it is), they wanted to have it. End of story.

They wanted to be able to protest for pay raises (which they, under a current capitalist government do not have anyway), they wanted to be able to say, "Hey man, I want a better quality of life!" (which, once more, they still don't have even under their extremist capitalist government) and not get beat up for being little shits.

I have spoken to Chinese from Mao's era (and even a tad post Mao), and they long for it back. They long for their old Communist government back because they are not so hard under America's thumb it is not even funny. More people are dying of not having basic necessities and shit really has not changed for the better now that they are able to say what they want.

Congratulations, kids. If you wanted to have some Gucci you could have saved up your money and gone to AMERICA with the rest of the consumer whores.


More on Mr. Tankian's Idiocies:

From a very recent Warsaw Interview:


"If you compare indigenous times with modern times, Indigenous times were more correlated with Matriarchal societies, where women had more of an I don't want to say control, but more of an openness to decisions having to do with society, because they were the bearers of family. Where if you look at modern society it's men who are more in control, and this comes from the Judeo-Christian culture. But even before that it comes from civilization itself, because civilization is based on agriculture. And agriculture is the man's world, and that's led to a little too much testosterone in bombs and all that."


Uhmm, Maybe Serjie would agree with Napoleon that women are no more than machines for producing children.

Unfortunately, my previous thoughts on the ancient Armenian Brain system was correct.  But then again, I would be tackling a lot more then just Serj on this one. This is for anyone who wants to know...

Women have been TOLD to make children and be polite and raise families, that is the only reason they do it. Do you think at the dawn of time all women could think about is "Aww look how cute that baby is!" Or "awww I want a baby and to bare a family!" It is something that has been indoctrinated by society and women themselves to think that that is the only purpose for the existence of the female race.

And actually, if you knew a damn thing about Native Culture as you so claim to be reading up on, you would know that the Native people had women in control of everything from War to land to the Hunt because that is what they derived from nature itself. They saw that females in nature were more cunning and wise them their male counterparts, and also brought life into this world, making them far wiser then men and far stronger (I do not want to get into modern scientific details supporting this now, but check back when I am less tired). Women were not in charge of Family during that time. Not at all, Men were and women ran the greater details. Men were and are more emotionally complete to take care of kids. Women are more emotionally complete to take care of Business (It is true when you think about it. Men are great at not loosing their minds when a kid whines, and women are so emotional that they take everything into consideration with business. A perfect Swap).

And as for society and agriculture, you are wrong again, Serj. Society only went INTO agriculture because of Capitalism. Capitalism forced society to rely on agriculture and later industrial. So, people now did not work their own land for their own family, they worked it for everyone else. And even during the more simplistic times before the industrial revolution, men overtook fields, not because it was only they who were able, but because they convinced themselves that women were too weak, should not be strong, and should more focus on family. I am sure more then a few hairy feminists at the time wanted to own land and work it themselves, I am sure it was many women who wanted to work their own land, but were basically barred from it. Men have overtaken things in society where they want to be able to feel that they are the only ones who can do it. And as a result, only recently were women allowed to even think about going to medical and law schools or partake in construction work. And even now, women are not flocking because they are still recovering from the thought that their only purpose is to have a family and they should stick to little jobs assisting men.  Well, as men rapidly fall from the workplace due to their own laziness and primal instinct to be wallpaper, women are taking over every "male" field and dominating it 20 fold better then men.  Men have no natural "work", Mr. Tankian. Men have no natural "Control". Men have no natural, nothing. Everything they have they have killed and scavenged for, and now nature herself is ripping these positions from men.

Now go and wash my dishes, Serj. Iron my suit, I have a court case at 5.



On to more of the ass-clownery!


"We need to first apologize to Iran for helping to overthrow their democratically elected government in the 1950s led by prime minister Mussadaq, and installing a King (the Shah) whose repression led to the people bringing in a religious leader to lead them. We need to be aware of the repercussions of our long-term policies in the Middle East. We should not be talking about invading any other countries right now. Iran is no more a threat to us than Grenada."


The fact that you are still acting at this point like America really has honest-to-God foreign policy scares me, Mr. Tankian.

Our Policies are just as long term as the interests behind them. Right now, I do not think there is a soul alive (other then the stupid ass troops) that think we are in there to actually LIBERATE the Middle East. Everyone has basically put it together that everything we do in there is to get something they have, and basically that dictates our foreign and national policies. 

Iraq WAS a threat? Ahaha. Afghanistan was the original Middle Eastern threat, because of Osama and the whole cover up of 9/11 (I am sure even Serj knows that 9/11 was just a reason to invade for oil, money and to evade the situation of the impending elections). It was very unclear, and still is, why we went into Iraq.  It is just a coincidence that it has a shitload of oil and the best way to get to it was to convince everyone that their leader was corrupt and we should over throw him (same leader that refused to give the oil to the States, On that note, Afghanistan was even used for it's oil, Everyone knows Osama did not do it, but they *in their brave and honest search for him, mind you* were able to install a President that would allow them put a pipeline from Afghanistan to the Caspian Sea to funnel natural Gases).


America only installs power and invades countries where it can get what it wants. America is not even run by the government you can see, it is run by the government that you can only THINK of.

It is not even a government, it is a whole... SYSTEM. It is the system of capitalism and it is the system of human greed.

I would let Mr. Tankian himself pick whoever the hell he wants for President, would there be a change in the system? Hell no. The leaders "we" choose (who we do not even really choose in the first place), will do nothing but represent the system in a different way, every single one unique and thus making us feel like we actually decide.

Funny enough every single president is related to the Queen. But that is another tale.

Anyway, in conclusion Iran will be invaded if they have something we want, or if the newly elected president suddenly finds a "major" threat.


" A democracy without its citizens knowing the truth is not a true democracy. "

Hmmm. But that has been democracy for centuries. It has been democracy in definition, even.

Right there is the line between communism and democracy. Where Communism encourages intelligence, demo[n]cracy encourages an idealistic government:

The government convincing the people that they are free and yet still having all the corruption of a regular-republican shitter government. Hoorah.

Isn't that just peachy? The amazing talent to be friends and free leaders with the same people you are ripping off?

Here, this is a better quote from Me:

"A Democracy with enlightened citizens is called true Communism."


And now, My FAVORITE:

"SOAD's lead singer Serj Tankian's grandfather was raised in an American missionary orphanage in Armenia after his parents and family were exterminated. "I would not be alive if not for the American orphanages that raised my grandfather after the Armenian Genocide of 1915, so I have a lot of love and respect for the good things that America has and can continue to achieve," Tankian told CMJ magazine. Religiously inspired hatred and violence is a deeply personal reality for these four musicians. We may forget. They cannot."

So here he is bitching about the Genocide of the Oppressors once more, but within it is a very very very important bit. Can you find it?

Having a hard time? Well here, I will show it to you:

"so I have a lot of love and respect for the good things that America has and can continue to achieve,"


:-D Ahhha! He really will say anything to get that stupid "genocide" recognized, won't he? He will just suck the dick of George Bush to get his shit done. The TRUE seal of a democrat!

But anyway, in this tiny little sentence he reviles how much he REALLY knows about all of this, everything he ever spoke about is now in question by my lovely leeches. He clearly knows nothing of what he speaks.

I suppose it is not his fault, I suppose anyone in this world who thinks they have an understanding of it is off and skewed. I suppose I can understand that he has no idea of what he speaks because no one has taken the time to educate this poor soul (he has obviously not taken the time to educate his own soul before he speaks).

There is no good in Amerikkka, my dear Serj. Everything that America has ever done has been a front for something else. RIGHT DOWN to the basics.

The Red Cross was actually the reason why 10+ million people die per year because of AIDS. The red cross screened the blood, found the AIDS and then when it saw it was going to Africa, sent it anyway. Something they will never admit too, it is popular to believe they did it to kill off the African people.

Amnesty International (you know that stupid ass "NGF" organization Serj loves so much) is almost 100% funded by the government in cloak. Not financially, mind you, oh no they have regular people for that (they raised something like 2 or 3 million in 24 hours the day after 9/11).  Here is an excellent excerpt from the site "Sigfried, Carl and Fred" at:

 http://sigcarlfred.blogspot.com/2005/05/truth-about-amnesty-international-lies.html

"The media, in their response to the AI report are devoting millions of words excoriating the US, Israel and other democratic states. What the media and AI will not tell you is why there is an imbalance in the amount of words expended on the US, Israel and other states in the AI report. The fact of the matter is, outside of democratic states, AI is severely hampered in their information gathering. That's right- the worst offenders do not allow access to their countries. There is a dearth of information. In other words, AI is aware they don't know. AI can't be bothered to tell you that reality. If they did, their credibility as the informed source of human rights information would be compromised.

There is something else AI and the media won't tell you. What little access AI has to many countries is directly related to what they write about that country. Ask yourselves a question: Why would a country with a notorious human rights record allow AI back in, after a 'bad' report? The answer is simple. By playing down the severity of the human rights violations, AI guarantees itself the ability to return. Once again, it's about credibility. If AI can show 'access,' it is presumed they are reporting the truth. Notorious human rights violators are only too happy to be in 'middle of the pack."

Amnesty International HAS all the facts, and sometimes forges them for the sake of the Government, but ignore that. Those are just minor details. (Ever spoken to a North Korean? Yeah, they can speak to out of country people. And in fact, they are pretty sick of AI spreading lies about them and their country. Watch out AI, there is a few thousand very pissed No.Koreans up your ass, but it is good enough for AI if they can support the American Government to invade North Korea for their Molybdenum, right?).

Amnesty International is no more then a tool. It shows what it wants, and funny enough, most of the time what IT wants is what the government NEEDS them to say in order to confirm an invasion or.. lets say.. a genocide.


"Animals and Nature don't see borders"


Hmmmmm...  You are an idiot, you know that? I hope you do by now.

I suppose Serj has never tried to enter a Lynx ring, or perhaps go about 2 feet up a tree, where Monkey's now consider theirs, and theirs alone. Dogs shit and piss to mark territory, and cats mate on the ground which they claim. Cougars rub themselves on rocks to leave their scents, and ants build small rings around their hill, marking their land.

Animals, quite clearly, see borders.

Animals are very scared and threatened ONLY when they leave their border, did you know that? When animals leave their land to hunt and whatnot, they are on extra attack mode, specifically because outside their border it is uncharted territory, it does not belong to them and they are making risks.

Animals make borders for protection and prowess, the more land a female or male has, the more attractive they become to a mate. 

Humans make borders for power and to separate control and language. Of course we all know every leader is connected and working with each other (and not for peace, either), but I do not think Serj knows this.

Anyway! We have just proven Serj Tankian wrong, once more. Now will someone please throw him in a Lynx ring?




ANYWAY~ That is the end of my rant to Mr. Serj Tankian, ladies and gentlemen. Let's see if he ever gets this (and takes it to heart).


~Lynch~